Wine Traffic #9 For 20�Sep�1999
Table Of Contents
This is the ninth release of the Wine's kernel cousin publication. It's main
goal is to distribute widely what's going on around Wine (the Un*x windows
�Archive Link: "Winsock (cont'd)"
Ulrich Weigand,�Alexandre Julliard,�,�Ove K�ven
The discussion regarding implementation of Winsock continued (see last
week's WWN article for more information).
Several issues have been addressed:
Alexandre Julliard proposed to store the handle to the socket in
the server, but to retrieve the attached Unix fd each time it's needed
on the client side (mainly because other threads may have changed its
state, or even deleted it).
The tricky part lies in how the client side will be notified of the changes
on the unix sockets fd. A first track was to let the socket handles be
selectable in WaitFor... functions. Ove K�ven reported that Winsock 2
doesn't allow it, but Ulrich Weigand said
- How to split functions between the wineserver and the client
- How to handle the asynchronous operations ?
- Where to store the data (client side, server side, mixed) ?
- How to detect when a socket has been closed ?
Win95 at least WSOCK32 uses a trick to be able to wait on sockets using
WaitForMultipleObjects: there's an undocumented KERNEL32 routine
CreateSocketHandle which returns a handle to a K32OBJ of type K32OBJ_SOCKET
This solution had some drawbacks: bad behavior when several threads
asynchronously wait on the same socket handle; the client (or the
service thread) cannot determine when to clean-up the allocated data
(they are not aware of handle deletion).
Ove, Alexandre and Ulrich tried some other solutions, and ended with
this one: the wine-server will be enhanced so that it can associate an
event to a unix (socket) fd. When, in the select() loop on the
wine-server, the fd receives an action, it will trigger the event; the
service thread, on the client side, will then be able to do its
job. This allows both to solve the issue "can socket handles be
WaitFor...:ed", and also to clearly define which actions the fd must
wait on. Is this case, the socket handles will have the same behavior
as file handles with respect to WaitFor... functions.
Most of the operations (recv/send...) shall be done on the client
side, but a new wine server command will be introduced to both
re-enable the sockets in the select loop, but also to detect which
ones may have been deleted, so that the correct deallocation can occur.
Ove estimates that one week is the needed time to get something
working: you can watch progess on his project
Future of Window Manager
�Archive Link: "Future of Window Manager"
Dennis Bj�rklund,�Ulrich Weigand,�
Dennis Bj�rklund sent out some bits reguarding the evolution of X11 Window
Managers, along with some issues he had with current Wine windows managing
Couldn't we tell the window manager
that we don't want any decorations and paint our own window (look at xmms
for example). If we run wine without -managed the look is correct, but not
Ulrich Weigand said this could be done with
modifying the unmanaged mode (or maybe add a new mode) so it
doesn't set override-redirect on top-level windows, but instead lets the WM
manage those windows just like in managed mode, except it uses some (yet to
be defined) hints to tell the WM to remove all frame decorations. Except for
that, all painting would be done exactly like in the unmanaged
case... Ulrich was sure that not all window managers would correctly
support the needed hints, and this would lead to bad behavior:
of course, we could always rely on the user to select
that mode only if supported by the WM, but some kind of automatic fall-back
would still be nice...
Dennis then reported the undergoing work for KDE, Gnome and other
window managers to better specify what the WMs are supposed to provide
(in other words an improved version of the ICCCM). Undergoing work can
(some of the links there seem to be broken: but you
can browse the directory content ;-) ). From the
list of participants (or willing to participate or "being willed" to
participate), this is something Wine developpers should follow up.
�Archive Link: "Fonts"
Gavriel State,�Douglas Ridgway,�Alexandre Julliard,�,�Patrik Stridvall
One of the favourite Wine discussion issues popped up once again:
Gavriel State posted:
Gav' then introduced several options to tackle the issues he brought
We've been looking at the font issue quite
closely for the last few weeks, and we have explored a couple of
First of all, here are the primary problems we see with fonts on WINE:
- Can't get at the outline data to support GetGlyphOutline call
- Various font sizing and metrics issues
- No support for antialiasing
- X font system is very confusing and hard to set up for the average user.
Patrik Stridvall proposed, for option B/, to put all the related
material inside a driver (instead of using #ifdef), because it makes
Alexandre Julliard happier (Patrik reported some bad adventures he had
with patches full of #ifdef:s being rejected by Alexandre), but also
it's easier to setup (and also enable and disable) and can even allow
to hook up another driver to support a (specific) protocol to another
TrueType enabled font server. Later on, Patrik also sent the URL for a mini-HOWTO (http://www.dimensional.com/~bgiles/debian-tt.html)
dedicated to TrueType server setup for the Debian distribution.
Douglas Ridgway also commented option B/:
Link directly to FreeType (note that
FreeType 2.0 supports Type1 fonts in addition to TrueType).
We've already done some experimentation along these lines and we have
a preliminary implementation of GetGlyphOutline that works using direct
calls to FreeType.
FreeType would solve (1) and (2) quite easily - we would just get the
info directly from FreeType. It would introduce another problem though:
if we use FreeType to get metrics and outlines, but X to render the fonts
(through something like xfsft), subtle differences crop up between the
X-rendered font and the numbers we get back from FreeType.
We could solve this by using FreeType for rendering as well, which would
also solve issue (3), but at the expense of making remote display much
slower than it has to be. If we did that, we would also solve issue
(4) since all the TT fonts would be in a standard place such as
/usr/share/fonts/truetype. If we didn't, the user is still stuck
with configuring an X server.
Finally, there's the TrueType patent issue which has yet to be resolved.
(Please put up your hand if you hate software patents)
Encourage development of extensions to the X Font Server protocol
that would enable us to get access to the font outlines.
This would solve (1) and (2), while leaving (3) and (4) unresolved.
Note that there was some work done on the 'XAnti' extension for
XFree 4.0, but I believe that it was abandoned.
We've actually had some contact with a vendor that has a font
server that implements these kind of extensions along with an
SDK for getting at the outlines. The code would not be free though.
Their work also solves issue (4) in a different way.
How do people feel about adding optional support for a non-free
library that provides this functionality? Alexandre, if we did
work to support such a library (ifdefed, of course), would you allow
that work into CVS, or would we have to keep a seperate branch
My hope is that the vendor would be willing to release the information
about the protocol they're using so that XFree and other X server
developers could support the extension protocol themselves in
far as getting font outlines and doing font management, there's an
alternative to building the added functionality into an XFS protocol
extension. You can talk to the font server via a side channel. When I last
looked at this, I thought there was enough flexibility in an unmodified xfs
(with tt support) for our purposes, managing fonts by changing the config
file and directing xfs to reread it, and maintaining a table of font file to
Windows font correspondances, to allow things like outlines. I never got to
a proof of concept however. My understanding of the commercial offerings was
that they use a side channel as well, rather than building an extension to
the XFS protocol, but I could be wrong.
�Archive Link: "Clipboard (cont'd)"
Noel Borthwick,�,�Patrik Stridvall
Noel Borthwick reported he's almost done with the clipboard server and
1) sent out a quick overview of the server implementation:
2) and asked for help in order to integrate his development into the
Wine tree (especially the needed Makefiles for a good cross platform
Patrik Stridvall then discussed some details of the implementation with
Noel. Patrik main concerns were around the fact that the clipboard server is
spawn when a Wine process exits: Noel implementation lets the process, when
running, handle all the X11 and Windows clipboard operations; but, when the
process exits, if it owns some clipboard selection, it then spawns this very
server, in order to let this selection being available (either to X11 or to
Windows clipboard) after the process has exited. Patrik didn't like the idea
of spawning the server, and would better see a server running all the time;
Patrik and Noel agreed that, if this proposal had to be implemented, this
server should hold the selection all the time, which would led the windows
clipboard implementation to grasp data from it (current implementation
caches the clipboard content inside the process). In order to provide an
efficient implementation, shared memory shall be used between the Wine
processes and this server.
Both agreed that Noel's work was a very acceptable short term solution, and
that this discussion was the long term roadmap the clipboard implementation
The server is a standalone pure XLib
application. The makefile builds a target called "wineclipsrv". wineclipsrv
takes one command line argument which is a bit mask of the selection types
to be acquired. Currently we just support two selections PRIMARY (internal
mask value 1) and CLIPBOARD (internal mask value 2). If no argument is
supplied the server aquires all selections. (mask value 3)
When the server is started it first queries the current selection owner of
the specified selections for the TARGETS selection target. It then proceeds
to cache all the formats exposed by TARGETS. If the selection does not
support the TARGETS target, or if no target formats are exposed, the server
simply exits. Once the cache has been filled, the server then actually
acquires ownership of the respective selection and begins fielding selection
requests. Selection requests are serviced from the cache. If a selection is
lost the server flushes its internal cache, destroying all data previously
saved. Once ALL selections have been lost the server terminates.
Now when Wine terminates, we check if Wine owns any selections. If it does
we spawn the server with the appropriate selection masks. This captures the
selection data from Wine and takes over the selection.
DGA 2.0 and Wine
�Archive Link: "DGA 2.0 and Wine"
Lionel Ulmer,�Ulrich Weigand,�,�Patrik Stridvall
Lionel Ulmer started integrating DGA 2.0 into Wine. Nevertheless,
there were some issues to solve:
Ulrich Weigand proposed:
I started some days ago to add DGA 2.0 support to
DirectDraw (to use the new possibilities like depth / resolution switching
and hardware blits with and without transparencies).
By doing a small test program, I found out that, whatever I do, when I
start using DGA, all mouse movements reported by XMotionEvents are
The game I am testing with (Baldur's Gate) uses DirectDraw for its
graphics but standard USER calls for its mouse input (to be more
precise, USER.17 GetCursorPos16).
When I test the game with DGA, the mouse does not move at all. This is
because as long as DGA is enabled, XQueryPointer always returns the
position of the mouse before entering DGA.
As GetCursorPos16 calls EVENT_QueryPointer, I concluded that I need to
add a new driver specific to this case that would use all the
XMotionEvents to compute the absolute mouse position by adding all the
relative events and clip to the screen size.
Lionel noted that some remaining points needed to be solved:
to fix this in our USER itself, instead of
hacking the driver: on real Windows, USER must cope with whatever it gets
passed to its mouse_event routine. In particular, USER must cope if the
mouse_event routine is called only with relative
events. In this case
it is the task of USER
to add up the relative events so as to track
the absolute position!
So, what would you say to this solution: throw out completely the
EVENT_QueryPointer routine. Instead, create USER-global variables holding
the current mouse position; at all places where QueryPointer is currently
called, use those variables instead. The variables are filled
mouse_event routine, which is furthermore changed to cope with both absolute
and relative mouse events. In the case of absolute events, it simply sets
the global variables to the given values, while in the case of relative
events, it keeps adding them up.
Next, modify the X11DRV_EVENT driver to send relative mouse events if DGA is
active (it should know that ...), and absolute mouse events whenever
possible (just like now).
Patrik Stridvall and Lionel also discussed some other issues related to
hot-swap drivers in Wine for keyboard, mouse, screen.
we will have to do some screen-clipping when
adding the relative coordinates. And I did not find any solution to change
the current monitor width / height. What will happen : Wine is started with
1024x768 (for example), the game calls DDraw::SetDisplayMode() to change the
resolution to 640x480. There is no way that I can see to let USER know that
the screen width / height has changed and that it should clip the absolute
coordinates with other values than the one at start-up.
- how to synchronize at DGA startup between the existing mouse handler and
the DGA one (there's some race condition about queued X11 events).
Sharon And Joy