|Home | News | RSS Feeds | Mailing Lists | Authors Info | Mirrors | Stalled Traffic|
Table Of Contents
|1.||14�Nov�2003�-�3�Dec�2003||(21 posts)||modules.pnpmap Output Support|
|2.||25�Nov�2003�-�1�Dec�2003||(54 posts)||Some Discussion Of IDE/SATA Status|
|3.||26�Nov�2003�-�1�Dec�2003||(6 posts)||Linux 2.6.0-test11 Released; Andrew Morton Official Maintainer|
|4.||27�Nov�2003�-�1�Dec�2003||(10 posts)||Large VM Blocksize Support; Status Of sysenter|
|5.||28�Nov�2003�-�4�Dec�2003||(40 posts)||Linux 2.4.23 Released; 2.4 Series Enters Deep Freeze|
|6.||30�Nov�2003||(1 post)||Split XFS Patches For 2.4.23|
|7.||30�Nov�2003�-�4�Dec�2003||(66 posts)||Status Of XFS In 2.4; More Evidence Of 2.4 Deep Freeze|
|8.||1�Dec�2003||(5 posts)||Status Of The 2.0 Kernel (Yes, The 2.0 Kernel)|
|9.||2�Dec�2003||(1 post)||kexec Updated For 2.6|
|10.||3�Dec�2003||(1 post)||udev 008 Released|
|11.||3�Dec�2003�-�4�Dec�2003||(5 posts)||Minutes From OSDL Talk At LSE Conference Call|
|12.||4�Dec�2003||(1 post)||kdb v4.3 Released For ia64 Platform Under Kernel 2.6.0-test11|
|13.||4�Dec�2003||(1 post)||Linux Test Project December Release|
|14.||4�Dec�2003||(1 post)||Software Upgrade On kernel.org Server|
|15.||4�Dec�2003||(1 post)||Accessing BitKeeper Trees Through kbuild|
Mailing List Stats For This Week
We looked at 1247 posts in 6441K.
There were 462 different contributors. 214 posted more than once. 151 posted last week too.
The top posters of the week were:
1. modules.pnpmap Output Support
14�Nov�2003�-�3�Dec�2003 (21 posts) Subject: "modules.pnpmap output support"
Topics: Backward Compatibility, Hot-Plugging
People: Takashi Iwai,�Rusty Russell,�Andrey Borzenkov
Takashi Iwai said:
The attached patch makes depmod to output modules.pnpmap file generated from the pnp device table.
The output format is not compatible with the old modules.isapnpmap. The new format shows the pnp id string (e.g. CTL0301) while the old format uses the hex numbers. I don't think it's worthy to keep the compatibility for this (since the new one is more intuitive), but it'd be easy to follow the old style.
Rusty Russell remarked:
That seems strange. If you don't worry about backwards compatibility, then the new scripts/file2alias.c approach is better, which generates aliases for each module (depmod then collects these into /lib/modules/`uname -r`/modules.alias for speed).
The tables generated by depmod are purely for backwards compatibility, although it does look like they will be required throughout 2.6 at this stage.
Does that clarify?
This made sense to Takashi, but he also pointed out, "still, file2alias (as of test9) doesn't output the entries for pnp devices..." Rusty invited Takashi to submit a patch, and Andrey Borzenkov also said to Takashi, "Sure it does not, noone did it as yet. If you do it please let me know, specifically about format for aliases." Takashi replied:
first i'll try to add the support of old isapnp format for compatibility, so that old programs can work as they are.
the file2alias format of (isa) pnp devices will need variable number of items, since a driver may require multiple ids. for example, snd-cs4236 driver supports the cards with three ids like
and four ids like
in each case, a matching card must include all ids listed there.
well, i'm not sure which identifier (separator) letter in which style should be used. something like
?? separators including a number might be a bad idea, though...
Half an hour later he reported that he'd added support for the old isapnp format, and asked Rusty for some feedback. Rusty replied, "Hmm, I had to modify it a little. You have to be careful for 32-bit and 64-bit kernels, and I added a couple of tests to the testsuite. I have uploaded -pre4 with these changes in it." Takashi thanked him, and went on, "now we need to modify file2alias... once when the format is defined, the implementation should be quite easy."
Elsewhere, Takashi said:
the attached is the patch to add pnp entries to file2alias.c. i moved the definitions of pnp_device_id and pnp_card_device_id into mod_devicetable.h as other devices do. if you don't like it, i'll try to revert them and put definitions inside file2alias.c to keep the changes minimum.
the format of pnp alias is:
where XXXYYYY is the pnp id with 7 letters (e.g. CTL0031), c shows the card id, and d means the device id. multiple device ids will be listed depending on the driver.
alias pnp:dYMH0021* opl3sa2
alias pnp:cALS0001d@@@0001d@X@0001d@H@0001* snd_als100
Andrey, would it be feasible for hotplug stuff?
Andrey Borzenkov replied:
Will then every d be passed as separate parameter to hotplug? It means agent has to deal with unknown number of parameters or are there always fixed number of devs? apparently not as max is 8 and in your example only 3 are defined.
If number is variable I guess better would be
i.e. put all devs IDs in one field; actually may be even separator is redundant as IDs have strict format to my knowledge.
Then hotplug agent gets two parameters - PNPID and PNPDEVS - and it is quite easy to build alias.
Takashi responded to Andrey's first paragraph, saying that "yes. the number of probed devices is variable. note that, as seen above, there are two cases: with a card id and without a card id. in the latter case, the card id is not checked but only the given device id is checked, while the former case will need checks all ids." Given this, he agreed with Andrey's 'alias pnp:cXXXXXXdYYYYYYY[:YYYYYY...]' format.
There was some more technical discussion elsewhere, between Takashi various folks.
2. Some Discussion Of IDE/SATA Status
25�Nov�2003�-�1�Dec�2003 (54 posts) Subject: "Silicon Image 3112A SATA trouble"
Topics: Disks: IDE, Disks: SCSI, Serial ATA
People: Prakash K. Cheemplavam,�Julien Oster,�Jeff Garzik,�Marcus Hartig,�Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,�Miquel van Smoorenburg
Prakash K. Cheemplavam said:
I think it it high time to get the SIIMAGE.C 1.06 bugfree. It seems to have some problems with my HD+SATA converter mainly performance wise. I htink it is due to this error coming constanlty in dmesg unless I comment it out in the sources:
hde: sata_error = 0x00000000, watchdog = 0, siimage_mmio_ide_dma_test_irq
What is the problem? I think it may be due to the fact that I have an SiI3112A controller onboard and the driver detects it without the A revision (just as SiI3112). And/or it is due to the fact that I connected a PATA drive with a SATA converter to the controller.
Now with 2.6-test10 the performance got a bit better in comparison to test9 and prior 2.6 kernels. Before it was max 22MB/sec and now it is 25mb/sec. But it is still far away from 2.4.22-ac4 kernel which managed 37mb/s, which is still bad in comparison to windows which reaches 50mb/s.
It is NOT a problem of read-ahead. I tried various hdparm parameters and it didn't improve the situation. What makes the situation even worse:
When I try hdparm -d1 /dev/hde (though hdparm sates dma is already on) the drive stops working and I get some lines of erorrs like drive-seek error and some irq related stuff. So I have to push the button.
Someone else using a native SATA Maxtor on Sil3112 (dunno whether A or not) has no problems, hdparm -d works as well and he gets 40mb/sec with test10.
So what may be the problem, and how to get rid of it? (1. error message, 2. bad performance, 3. hdparm -d1 malfunctioning). 1 & 3 were also with 2.4.22-ac4 and 2 wasn't that bad, as stated above, so except 2 there is no regression, but also no fix yet. Changing max_kb_per_request didn't help either.
Several days later, he replied to himself in quite a different frame of mind:
I just tried the libata driver and it ROCKSSSS! So far, at least.
I already wrote about the crappy SiI3112 ide driver, now with libata I get >60mb/sec!!!! More then I get with windows.
Also tests with dd. This rocks. Lets see whether it likes swsup, as well...
So folks, try libata, as well.
I dunno what all is actuall needed. I enabled scsi, scie disk, scsi generic, sata and its driver. In grub I appended "doataraid noraid".
Julien Oster was very interested in this, but said:
I can't find the Silicon Image driver under
"SCSI low-level drivers" -> "Serial ATA (SATA) support"
under 2.6.0-test11. Just the following are there:
So, which kernel do I need?
Jeff Garzik replied, "You need to enable CONFIG_BROKEN :)"
Elsewhere, Jeff also said, "Note that (speaking technically) the SII libata driver doesn't mask all interrupt conditions, which is why it's listed under CONFIG_BROKEN. So this translates to "you might get a random lockup", which some users certainly do see. For other users, the libata SII driver works flawlessly for them..." Miquel van Smoorenburg asked if the code would be fixed, and Jeff replied, yes it would; but didn't clarify that statement. Marcus Hartig also reported, "I've also tested it with my new Maxtor SATA. And I must say: Many thanks, well done! Now, I can use 2.6.0-test under fedora with a fine speed ~ 50MB/s in disk reads." Marcus also offered to buy Jeff a "good drink in a fine location" if ever Jeff found his way into Germany.
Prakash also thanked Jeff hartily, adding, "You don't imagine how frustrated I became of the SiI bugger. :-)" But at this point Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz came in with:
Okay, stop bashing IDE driver... three mails is enough...
Apply this patch and you should get similar performance from IDE driver. You are probably seeing big improvements with libata driver because you are using Samsung and IBM/Hitachi drives only, for Seagate it probably sucks just like IDE driver...
IDE driver limits requests to 15kB for all SATA drives... libata driver limits requests to 15kB only for Seagata SATA drives...
Both drivers still need proper fix for Seagate drives...
Jeff tried out the patch and said it looked good to him. He also asked, "Do you have the Maxtor fix, as well? It's in libata's SII driver, though it should be noted that the Maxtor errata only occurs for PATA<->SATA bridges, and not for real Maxtor SATA drives." Bartlomiej replied, "Yes, siimage.c contains Maxtor fix as well, there is even comment from Alan about Marvell PATA<->SATA bridges..."
3. Linux 2.6.0-test11 Released; Andrew Morton Official Maintainer
26�Nov�2003�-�1�Dec�2003 (6 posts) Subject: "Beaver in Detox!"
Topics: Kernel Release Announcement
People: Linus Torvalds,�Rik van Riel,�Andrew Morton
Linus Torvalds announced Linux 2.6.0-test11, saying:
for everybody who thought "stoned beaver" wasn't an appropriate name for a kernel (yeah, I'm sure IBM really minds my naming scheme, and is deathly afraid it will scare away customers), I'm happy to tell you that the beaver just went into detox, and I'm taking the Thanksgiving weekend off.
I give you "Beaver in Detox", aka linux-2.6.0-test11. This is mainly brought on by the fact that the old aic7xxx driver was broken in -test10, and Ingo found this really evil test program that showed an error case in do_fork() that we had never handled right. Well, duh!
While at it, this also pulls in some firewire fixes and a few potential skbuff leakage points.
Please don't even bother sending me patches, because I'll be stuffing my face away from email over the next few days. And after that it will be up to Andrew to say how to go on from here.
Regarding the hand-off to Andrew Morton, Rik van Riel asked, "Does that mean you'll be ready to flame proposed 2.7 changes soon, even if integrating them will be a few months into the future ? ;)" But there was no reply.
4. Large VM Blocksize Support; Status Of sysenter
27�Nov�2003�-�1�Dec�2003 (10 posts) Subject: "pgcl-2.6.0-test5-bk3-17"
Topics: BSD, Big Memory Support, Clustering, Forward Port, Virtual Memory
People: William Lee Irwin III,�Hugh Dickins,�Zwane Mwaikambo
William Lee Irwin III said:
This is a forward port of Hugh Dickins' patch to implement ABI- preserving large software PAGE_SIZE support, effectively "large VM blocksize". It's also been called "subpages". "pgcl" is an abbreviation for "page clustering", after the historical but different BSD notion.
This is meant to make memory management more efficient by reducing the number of objects to manage, as well as establishing more physical contiguity of memory by keeping it pieces larger than what individual ptes map. This very noticeably reduces the space requirements for mem_map. I hope to eventually demonstrate further advantages like larger fs blocksize support and reduced sglist length requirements.
This release features a rewrite of all the fault handling logic, done to incorporate a forward port of hugh's original fault handlers. This should perform much better than prior releases as they efficiently implement COW unsharing's trivial case and have bounded search overhead, though there is clearly a lot of room for further optimization.
Tested for basic userspace functionality on a 256MB Thinkpad T21 and a 32GB NUMA-Q with 32KB PAGE_SIZE. It does break when you push it, though it does run init scripts, most programs, and some benchmarks here.
Available from: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/wli/vm/pgcl/
Incremental patches for all stages of the rewrite as well as cumulative diffs vs. 2.6.0-test5-bk3 and 2.6.0-test5 are also available there.
Later, he posted another patch, saying, "I wonder if this would be enough to get sysenter support going again. I've not got a sysenter-capable userspace around, so I can't really test this myself." Zwane Mwaikambo reported excellent success with that patch.
5. Linux 2.4.23 Released; 2.4 Series Enters Deep Freeze
28�Nov�2003�-�4�Dec�2003 (40 posts) Subject: "linux-2.4.23 released"
Topics: Serial ATA
People: Marcelo Tosatti,�Samuel Flory,�Xose Vazquez Perez,�J.A. Magallon,�Willy Tarreau
Marcelo Tosatti announced, "2.4.23-rc5 was released as 2.4.23 with no changes." Willy Tarreau and J.A. Magallon were vary happy to see this, and impressed. Close by, Samuel Flory asked, "Are you considering including libata support for 2.4.24? From my testing with a number of different embedded sata chipsets (mostly ICH, SI, and Promise) it appears very stable. I'm not seeing any data corruption or lockups when running Cerberus with 2.4.23-rc5 + libata patch. The only troubles I've had were with initialization of embedded promise sata controllers. (I still need to test with Jeff's latest fixes for this.)" Marcelo replied, "I'm happy to include it in 2.4 when Jeff thinks its stable enough for a stable series. ;)" But a couple of days later he changed his mind on the issue, responding to himself with, "I thought a bit more about this issue and I have a different opinion now. 2.6 is getting more and more stable and already includes libata --- users who need it should use 2.6." Xose Vazquez Perez asked, "Does it mean that 2.4.x is going to freeze, and only critical and security patches are going to be applied ?" And Marcelo replied, "Yes this will happen in the near future. I still might accept some "non critical" modifications (which is btw, not an objective definition) to 2.4.24, but for 2.4.25 that will be the rule."
6. Split XFS Patches For 2.4.23
30�Nov�2003 (1 post) Subject: "Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.23"
Topics: Access Control Lists, FS: XFS
People: Keith Owens
Keith Owens announced:
For some time the XFS group have been producing split patches for XFS, separating the core XFS changes from additional patches such as kdb, acl, dmapi. The split patches are released to the world with the hope that developers and distributors will find them useful.
Read the README in each directory very carefully, the split patch format has changed over a few kernel releases. Any questions that are covered by the README will be ignored. There is even a 2.4.24/README for the terminally impatient :).
7. Status Of XFS In 2.4; More Evidence Of 2.4 Deep Freeze
30�Nov�2003�-�4�Dec�2003 (66 posts) Subject: "XFS for 2.4"
Topics: FS: XFS
People: Marcelo Tosatti,�Nathan Scott,�Stephan von Krawczynski
Nathan Scott announced some XFS updates, and Marcelo Tosatti replied, "I think XFS should be a 2.6 only feature. 2.6 is already stable enough for people to use it." Nathan replied:
Please reconsider -- the "core" kernel changes we need have existed for three+ years outside of the mainline tree, and each is a small and easily understood change that doesn't affect other filesystems. There is also a VFS fix in there from Ethan Benson, as we discussed during 2.4.23-pre, when you asked us to resend XFS for 2.4.24-pre!) Everything there is a backport from 2.6 in some form, there should be no surprises.
Not having XFS in 2.4 is extremely disadvantageous for us XFS folks (especially since every other journaled filesystem has been merged now). To our users it means some rescue disks simply don't support XFS, meaning you can't mount filesystems when you _really_ need to, etc, etc. Its also always extra work for distributors to merge XFS themselves, and hence a few just don't (and occasionally tell us that they are waiting for you to merge it) - which means some users don't even get the option of using XFS, despite our best efforts.
>From discussions with distributors, a stable 2.6 distribution will be many months after 2.6.0 is officially released, so these issues are not going to go away anytime soon.
So, please merge XFS this time round - its actively developed, has a large installed user base, and has been maintained outside of 2.4 for a long time. We have waited patiently as each release goes by for you to give us the nod, and have been knocked back on a number of occasions while various other merges are being done.
Marcelo at first stood firm. A bit farther along in the discussion, Stephan von Krawczynski remarked, "developer environment is pretty different from the real world, so don't dump 2.4 too early please." To which Marcelo replied, "I'm not dumping 2.4. It will enter "maintenance-only" mode in 2.4.25. It will be update as long as there are problems in it, but no more features will creep in." But he did also acknowledge:
As for XFS, Christoph will review the patches and tell me what he thinks.
Also other people mailed me saying they reviewed the code.
That makes me more comfortable with merging the XFS modifications.
8. Status Of The 2.0 Kernel (Yes, The 2.0 Kernel)
1�Dec�2003 (5 posts) Subject: "Clean up older Kernels"
People: David Weinehall,�Jeff Garzik
Thomas Babut pointed out that there had been a 2.0.40-rc6 out for a long time, and suggested releasing a 2.0.40 official kernel. Jeff Garzik agreed that it made sense to release 2.0.40; he suggested asking David Weinehall, the 2.0 maintainer. But David had nothing to say during the thread.
9. kexec Updated For 2.6
2�Dec�2003 (1 post) Subject: "[announce] kexec 2.6.0-test10/test11 updates"
People: Randy Dunlap
Randy Dunlap announced, "I've updated kexec for 2.6.0-test10 and 2.6.0-test11. The patches are available in subdirectories of: http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/kexec/"
10. udev 008 Released
3�Dec�2003 (1 post) Subject: "[ANNOUNCE] udev 008 release"
Topics: FS: devfs, FS: sysfs, Hot-Plugging, Version Control
People: Greg KH,�Kay Sievers,�Dave Jones
Greg KH announced:
I've released the 008 version of udev. It can be found at:
rpms are available at:
with the source rpm at:
udev is a implementation of devfs in userspace using sysfs and
/sbin/hotplug. It requires a 2.6 kernel to run. Please see the udev
FAQ for any questions about it:
The way the configuration files for udev was structured has changed a lot. Previously there were two config files, /etc/udev/udev.config and /etc/udev/udev.permissions. The location of these files could be overridden in the build process, or at runtime with environment variables.
Now there is a single config file at /etc/udev/udev.conf. The contents of that file tell udev where its other config files are located at (for the rules and permissions) and specify other configurable things. For more details about this file, please see the man page, which covers this file and how it is set up. Also see the default udev.conf file provided in the release.
The major changes since the 007 release are:
Again, many thanks to Kay Sievers, for lots of great patches in this release. I'm really thankful for the automated test script and the regex matching he has provided. This release included patches from lots of other people, all detailed below.
There are a few features coming in the next version of libsysfs that should help udev out a bunch, but this release is showing how flexible udev is at in creating different types of device names. If you haven't tested udev out yet, thinking it was still to early, I suggest trying this release out, as it's quite full featured now.
I'm still looking for a devfs naming scheme config file. Can anyone verify that udev supports everything yet now or not? I know I've been saying this for a few releases now...
The full ChangeLog can be found below.
udev development is done in a BitKeeper repository located at:
Daily snapshots of this tree can be found at:
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/bitkeeper/udev/ Many thanks to Dave Jones for managing this.
11. Minutes From OSDL Talk At LSE Conference Call
3�Dec�2003�-�4�Dec�2003 (5 posts) Subject: "Minutes from OSDL talk at LSE call today"
Topics: Ottawa Linux Symposium, Version Control
People: Hanna Linder,�Larry McVoy,�Cliff White,�Marcelo Tosatti,�John Cherry,�Zwane Mwaikambo
Hanna Linder reported:
LSE Call minutes from Dec 3, 2003
Zwane Mwaikambo - OSDL experiences
Generally working with the OSDL has been great.
In order to use the OSDL machines you have to sign up to be an associate and register a project. Then wait for OSDL to review it. Zwane just wanted a large marchine to work on the irq subsystem. He needed access to the NUMA-Q machines to test for regressions.
Most of his interactions have been with Christine who is fairly responsive to email and has fixed the few problems that have popped up.
Zwane has had some trouble using the PLM (Patch Lifetime Manager). Cliff is going to talk to him about using it. Zwane has been doing something similar manually.
The STP enables the engineer to save time by not having to wait inbetween each step. It automates much of the testing process.
Marcelo Tosatti - Also uses the OSDL machines. He said it has been very easy to use. They are the only high mem systems he has available now. He uses them to stress test stuff and sometimes test 2.6 on it.
Zwane said he likes the cross compilation capabilities recently added. Cliff said that was a direct result of comments from OLS this year.
Zwane said one downside of STP and Tinderbox is the huge amount of data that comes out of it and it is hard to parse. He would prefer more minimal info saying if the kernel booted or not and the some of the errors. Cliff told him to try HackBench the most minimal of tests the STP runs.
The turn around time from patch submission to results on an idle system is 1.5 hours. Due to the reimaging of the entire system between runs. Cliff is going to look into making that faster.
Bill Irwin suggested using nfs for the root partition then the host system can feed it nfs and could cleanup and check using md5checksums which would be much faster than reimaging. Cliff said most users wont use nfs on root and it may effect the benchmark results. Bill said most benchmarks arent run on root anyway. Cliff said it is a good idea and worth looking into.
Cliff White - Kernel Tinderbox
History- Came from Brazil. Christian Reis of Asynch Open Source who worked on the Mozilla Tinderbox asked Marcelo about doing a Kernel Tinderbox. Marcelo told Christian to go talk to the OSDL people and the rest is history.
The Mozilla Tinderbox is based on CVS and can do fancy things with triggers. The kernel one is not as fancy because they are still working out issues with BK.
Basically, the client runs in a loop and every 15 minutes wakes up and checks bkbits. If there are any changes within thos 15 minutes the new kernel is downloaded and compiled with John Cherry's comp regress script, which is exhaustive. The best way to see the results is to go to http://developer.osdl.org and click on the tinderbox link. or here (http://tinderbox.osdl.org/showbuilds.pl?tree=linux2.5-bk)
Intel has contributed a 32 and 64 bit client. OSDL is looking to get other architectures added to it (hint hint nudge nudge, especially Power right now).
Marcelo asked if it also boots the kernel. Cliff, no it just compiles at this point. Working on a client that will boot but the STP is best for booting an unknown kernel generally. Cliff is looking at using STP as a client of Tinderbox.
They are not doing mm or other trees as they only work off bkbits right now.
Cliff asked if anyone has Power hardware they could really use one. It doesnt have to be onsite, just need access to a machine. Zwane said they could use cross compilation to test Power stuff instead since they dont boot.
If anyone has a desire to tweak the client is available off Cliffs page on osdl: http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/
Larry McVoy replied, regarding the BitKeeper issues around the kernel tinderbox. He said, "If we could get a list of these issues we'll try and see what we can do to help. My response has been a bit spotty lately, I've needed to take some personal time, so pinging firstname.lastname@example.org is more likely to get you help." Cliff White replied:
We've exchanged some email with email@example.com, and they've been a great help. Really, there are two things.
The first is triggers. The Mozilla tinderbox is driven by triggers from CVS commits. I believe that triggers are resevered for the commercial version of BK.
However, unlike CVS, BK has a nice way of asking the remote repository if new changes exist, so we really don't need a trigger to tell us when to start a build. Instead, we run the timestamp column on a cron, so it is constantly incrementing. ( Mozilla only increments their timestamp column when a trigger is recieved )
The change from trigger-driven to time-driven timestamps meant we didn't try to create a link between timestamp->source commit. Again, since Mozilla is trigger driven, they have this link.
So, the second piece is linking either the time-stamp column or the build machine column directly to a Web-based view of the code. BkWeb already provides the view.
The main issue here is finding the proper syntax for the bkweb url so we get all of the changesets included in the commit. We've recieved a few examples from your support people, and we're using one currently.
Larry pointed out that BitKeeper's trigger support was identical in the commercial and non-commercial versions. He asked if there were any other issues; but no one came forth to describe any.
12. kdb v4.3 Released For ia64 Platform Under Kernel 2.6.0-test11
4�Dec�2003 (1 post) Subject: "Announce: kdb v4.3 is available for kernel 2.6.0-test11 ia64"
Topics: FS: XFS, USB
People: Keith Owens,�David Mosberger,�Jim Houston
Keith Owens announced:
This is alpha code. It has had minimal testing with a small set of config options. In particular it has not been tested with CONFIG_PREEMPT. It only works on vanilla ia64 boxes using serial console and PC keyboard/VT. Patches to port the kdb USB console support from 2.4 to 2.6 will be gratefuly accepted.
These 2.6.0-test11 patches must be applied in this order, against 2.6.0-test11 plus David Mosberger's linux-2.6.0-test11-ia64-031126 patch.
kdb-v4.3-2.6.0-test11-salinfo.bz2 (brings salinfo processing up to 2.4.23)
kdb-v4.3-2.6.0-test11-xfsidbg.bz2 (corrects out of date XFS debug code)
This is a clone from kdb v4.3-2.4.23, with changes from several people for 2.6, thanks to Xavier Bru and Jim Houston for 2.6 changes to kdb.
13. Linux Test Project December Release
4�Dec�2003 (1 post) Subject: "[ANNOUNCE] Linux Test Project December Release Announcement"
Topics: Access Control Lists, Bug Tracking, Disks: SCSI, FS: NFS, Real-Time, Version Control
People: Robert Williamson
Robert Williamson said:
The Linux Test Project test suite <http://www.linuxtestproject.org> has been released. The latest version of the testsuite contains 2000+ tests for the Linux OS. Our web site also contains other information such as: test results, a Linux test tools matrix, an area for keeping up with fixes for known blocking problems in the 2.5/2.6 kernel releases, technical papers and HowTos on Linux testing, and a code coverage analysis tool.
We encourage the community to post results, patches or new tests on our mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org> and use the CVS bug tracking facility to report problems that you might encounter with the test suite.
14. Software Upgrade On kernel.org Server
4�Dec�2003 (1 post) Subject: "Upgrading www.kernel.org to Apache 2"
People: Kees Cook
Kees Cook said, "Apache will be upgraded on kernel.org around 9pm Pacific time. Hopefully all should go well and no one will even notice. :) The outage shouldn't last any more than about 10 minutes. If you notice any problems afterwards, please email email@example.com."
15. Accessing BitKeeper Trees Through kbuild
4�Dec�2003 (1 post) Subject: "[BK PATCH 0/3] Teach kbuild to pull files from BK repository"
Topics: Kernel Build System, Version Control
People: David Dillow
David Dillow said:
I finally got tired of having to run "bk -r get" before doing a build, so I taught the kbuild system to get the needed files for me. I did most of the work before Sam added the KBUILD_OUTPUT option, so this doesn't work when you're building to a different directory. It could probably be added with a few tweaks to scripts/getfiles, but I'm lazy, and don't use KBUILD_OUTPUT myself. If that scratches your itch, then feel free to take this code and run with it. Same goes for CVS or subversion -- it should not be very difficult to get those working as well.
This isn't really meant for inclusion, just something that makes my life easier. Maybe it will make your's easier too. Though, I'll have to do many, many builds in order to make up for the lost time.... :)
Anyways, the patches follow, or BK users (the intended audience) can do a
bk pull http://typhoon.bkbits.net/autoget-2.5
Sharon And Joy
Kernel Traffic is grateful to be developed on a computer donated by Professor Greg Benson and Professor Allan Cruse in the Department of Computer Science at the University of San Francisco. This is the same department that invented FlashMob Computing. Kernel Traffic is hosted by the generous folks at kernel.org. All pages on this site are copyright their original authors, and distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.0.