<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<kc>

<title>GNUe Traffic</title>

<editor contact="mailto:psu@burdonvale.co.uk">Peter Sullivan</editor>

<issue num="118" date="29 May 2006 12:00:00 -0800" />

<headquote>&quot;<i></i>&quot;</headquote>

<intro>
  This newsletter mainly covers the the #gnuenterprise IRC channel, 
  with occasional coverage of the three main mailing lists 
  (gnue-announce, gnue and gnue-dev) for the 
  <a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org">GNU Enterprise</a> 
  project.
</intro>

<section 
   title="GNUe and tinyerp"
   subject="[IRC] 23 May 2006"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.2006-05-23"
   author="Peter Sullivan" 
   contact="mailto:psu@burdonvale.co.uk" 
   startdate="23 May 2006 12:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="23 May 2006 12:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Financials (Accounting)</topic>
<topic>Reports</topic>

<p>Further to 
<kcref title="Other free and open source software ERP projects" subject="[IRC] 21 Mar 2006" />, 
Fabien Pinckaers (pinky) asked <quote who="Fabien Pinckaers">about 
possible (or not) cooperation between GNUe et Tiny ERP ?
Both projects are similar on some points</quote>. Derek 
Neighbours (derek) said <quote who="Derek Neighbours">gnue 
really is a framework at this point w/o an ERP application 
(though reinhard is moving in that direction) - tiny erp 
seems to have erp type software. is tiny erp wanting to 
move to the gnue platform?</quote></p>

<p>Later, Fabien explained that his interest had been sparked 
by a message on the Tiny ERP discussion forum that 
<a href="http://tinyerp.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1464">mentioned
GNUe</a>. Reinhard M&#252;ller (reinhard) agreed 
<quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">that tiny erp and gnue have 
many similar approaches - however, I have looked a bit at 
tinyerp's code and I don't see many possibilities of sharing 
*code* at this point - what we could think about is, IMHO, 
sharing *ideas* or maybe even interfaces</quote>. Fabien 
felt that this was sensible - <quote who="Fabien Pinckaers">for 
example, about one year ago, I though that using GNUe's designer 
could be a good idea to design our views (we still not have a 
designer for our views)</quote>. Although 
<quote who="Fabien Pinckaers">both project are mature and 
too advanced to change design architecture</quote> it was 
still possible that <quote who="Fabien Pinckaers">some 
external part could be shared</quote>.</p>

<p>For instance, <quote who="Fabien Pinckaers">I think that 
GNUe could use our report engine based on OpenOffice without 
modifing GNUe parts (it is independant of Tiny ERP)</quote> - 
he <a href="http://tinyerp.com/flash/tiny_report.swf">pointed 
to</a> a flash demo. However, Tiny ERP were now 
<quote who="Fabien Pinckaers">thinking about creating a 
complete BI program in Python</quote> to allow On-Line 
Analytical Processing (OLAP) and data mining. This might be 
of interest to GNUe as well. Later, Reinhard noted that 
<quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">you might consider using parts 
of gnue-common for that, which would gain you database 
independence out of the box</quote>.</p>

<p>Earlier, Jason Cater (jcater) felt that even 
<quote who="Jason Cater">if nothing else can be shared, it 
would still be great to keep communications open - as there 
will be some people we'd be better off referring to tinyerp
- and vise-versa, I imagine</quote>. Reinhard said that he 
had <quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">already pointed quite 
some people to tinyerp that were looking for a turnkey 
erp system here</quote>. Jason also commented that 
<quote who="Jason Cater">it's good seeing others use 
python like we are</quote>.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="GNUe for both two-tier and three-tier applications"
   subject="[IRC] 23 May 2006"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.2006-05-23"
   author="Peter Sullivan" 
   contact="mailto:psu@burdonvale.co.uk" 
   startdate="23 May 2006 12:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="23 May 2006 12:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Application Server</topic>
<topic>Common</topic>
<topic>Forms</topic>
<topic>Reports</topic>
<topic>Designer</topic>

<p>Fabien Pinckaers (pinky) asked <quote who="Fabien Pinckaers">Is 
it possible the use some part of GNUe without the whole GNUe 
framework ? (like report designer for instance)</quote> Peter 
Sullivan (psu) confirmed this - <quote who="Peter Sullivan">GNUe 
Common has all the shared stuff - other than than, just use what 
you need - a very simple app in GNUe might just need Forms - 
or you can add Reports, Navigator, App Server and have it all 
singing all dancing</quote>. Reinhard M&#252;ller (reinhard) 
confirmed <quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">the idea behind gnue is 
that you can use it 2 ways - a) front-end (forms, reports) -&gt; 
database - b) front-end -&gt; appserver -&gt; database</quote>. 
This was because <quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">you can build simple 
apps where you put all the logic in the forms and the reports - 
as many real life gnue based applications are very small sized 
few table few forms apps</quote>. But 
<quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">for bigger apps you can choose 
to put logic in appserver</quote> since 
<quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">appserver then behaves like a 
database on crack (as somebody put it here) - you can define 
triggers and calculated fields with arbitary python code - 
but still you can use the same front end tools like gnue-
forms, gnue-reports, gnue-designer for both kinds of 
projects</quote>.</p>

</section>

</kc>