<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<kc>

<title>GNUe Traffic</title>

<author contact="mailto:psu@manorcon.demon.co.uk">Peter Sullivan</author>

<issue num="7" date="15 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800" />

<headquote>
Free, as in donuts - <cite>we opened up an 'account' at the local donut 
shope for good ole jcater - they accept paypal now....</cite>
</headquote>

<intro>

<p>This Cousin covers the three main mailing lists for the GNU 
Enterprise project, gnue, gnue-dev and gnue-announce. For more 
information about GNUe, see their home page at 
<a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org">
http://www.gnuenterprise.org</a>. Details of the mailing lists 
can be found at 
<a href="http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue">
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue</a>, 
<a href="http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue-dev">
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue-dev</a>,
<a href="http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue-announce">
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue-announce</a>.</p>

<p>It also covers, on an intermittant basis (i.e. when I have 
time), the #gnuenterprise IRC channel. A great deal of 
development discussion is still going on in IRC. You can find 
#gnuenterprise on irc.openprojects.net:6667, or you can review 
the logs at <a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/">
http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/</a>.</p>

</intro>

<section 
   title="Website text for GNUe Accounting/Financials"
   subject="[gnue-discuss] Accounting Text Version 2.0"
   archive="http://lists.gnue.org/pipermail/gnue-discuss/2001-December/000361.html"
   posts="12"
   startdate="30 Nov 2001 17:34:58 -0800"
   enddate="05 Dec 2001 18:36:31 -0800">

<topic>Financials (Accounting)</topic>

<p>Alan Clifford provided some sample text for the GNUe Accounting 
module descriptions, covering:</p>

<quote who="Alan Clifford">
<ul>
<li>Accounts Payable</li>
<li>Accounts Receivable</li>
<li>Cash Management</li>
<li>Fixed Assets</li>
<li>General Ledger</li>
<li>Allocations &amp; Recurring Transactions</li>
<li>Budgeting</li>
<li>Costing</li>
<li>Financial Statements</li>
</ul>
</quote>

<p>Neil Tiffin said the following additional modules were also 
included:</p>

<quote who="Neil Tiffin">
<ul>
<li>activity based costing</li>
<li>Bank reconciliation</li>
<li>Investment management</li>
<li>Project based costing</li>
<li>consolidated financial reporting</li>
</ul>
</quote>

<p>Phil Cole said he thought Customers and Suppliers 
<quote who="Phil Cole">should be in a Common area</quote>
shared between all the modules that used them. Alan said 
he kept changing his mind on this, and would go with the 
consensus. Neil said <quote who="Neil Tiffin">we 
are not final on this but currently we have defined organization 
as the common object with both customers and vendors inherited from a 
organization.</quote> Derek agreed.</p>

<p>Reinhard M&#252;ller said Alan's content 
<quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">looks 100% Ok to me. :)</quote>, 
but wondered if it should be called GNUe Financials rather than GNUe 
Accounting. Neil and Alan both felt Financials was the industry-standard 
terminology. Derek Neighbors uploaded Alan's text 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">with some modifcations</quote> 
to the web site for further comments.
He pointed out that <quote who="Derek Neighbors">GNUe Reports will 
handle all reporting from all the systems</quote>, but Alan said 
he understood that, but felt <quote who="Alan Clifford">the 
financial report generator is specialized because it has lots of 
formatting and summarizing logic working on a single, fairly simple 
database.</quote></p>

</section>


<section 
   title="GNUe Human Resources (HR) proposal"
   subject="HR Package Proposal"
   archive="http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/gnue/2001-December/002880.html"
   posts="8"
   startdate="02 Dec 2001 06:19:08 -0800"
   enddate="05 Dec 2001 18:43:53 -0800">

<topic>Human Resources</topic>

<p>Neil Tiffin announced that 
<a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/~neilt/GNUe_HR_Package.txt">a 
proposal</a> for GNUe HR had been written by Mark Smith, and 
asked for comments. He noted that <quote who="Neil Tiffin">We 
already have an employee class in base.person</quote> which 
could be re-used. Kevin Handy poited out that there were a lot of 
date fields in the proposal, which were not necessarily exhaustive. 
Instead he suggested <quote who="Kevin Handy">a date history file </quote> 
with a code, date and description. <quote who="Kevin Handy">The 
file would be cululative (rows are added, not changed, when
anything changes).</quote> This would enable a large number of fields 
to be removed from the definition, and would be easily extensible.
He also suggested changes to the emergency contact table.
Mark said the date proposals sounded a good idea, but 
<quote who="Mark Smith">My only concern would be if it made user queries 
more difficult to write: could we avoid making people think 'give me everyone 
with date code nn date before 1970', when what they mean is 'give me everyone 
with date_of_birth before 1970'?</quote> Derek Neighbors said he wasn't so sure - 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">this type of schema reminds me of unflexible
code that puts things in slush tables so its 'easy' to add new data 
collection items. The problem is that generally the input for them looks like 
crap and are in odd places and reporting against them are pure hell.</quote>
As GNUe implementors would always have access to the source code, it might make 
more sense to let them just add whatever dates they needed to the table as extra 
fields, rather than have a seperate, multi-row, dates table.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, Neil said he had made space in CVS for the proposals, and would 
formally add them in the standard formats - <quote who="Neil Tiffin">ps, rtf, 
tex, docbook, and html</quote> - once FSF copyright assignment had been 
received. He suggested sticking to plain text for the moment whilst changes 
were being made.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.10Dec2001">
on IRC</a>, Derek Neighbors (dneighbo) commented on the HR proposal. There was 
some over-zealous cut and paste in places. GNUe also needed to be consistant 
about whether it was 'Human Resource' or 'Human Resources'. 
He agreed that <quote who="Derek Neighbors">planning, time and expenses 
and project management belong elsewhere :)</quote> and picked up a few 
other minor typos.</p> 

<p>Neil Tiffin (neilt) asked about industry <quote who="Neil Tiffin">templates 
- how will these be done ?</quote> Derek said this needed 
defining. Neil said <quote who="Neil Tiffin">i am reluctant to refer to 
something we have no idea how it will work</quote> He felt that 
<quote who="Neil Tiffin">an implementation framework not a conceptual 
framework</quote> for templates was needed. Derek said he agreed, but 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">until rest of the core team is ready to start 
discussing it doenst do a lot of good :(</quote></p>

<p>Derek said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">i didnt get a chance to fully 
go over the class information (gcd's)</quote> but he thought 
the proposal was a good start. He said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">
i want/need some of this stuff, but having in all gcd is killing me
as i cant implement a gnue solution that way today :( - 
so i either have to undo the gcds into a relational format
or roll my own</quote>. He was <quote who="Derek Neighbors">hoping 
jamest can get a decent forms/geas driver, but its not lookign 
promising - lots of performance and holes in some things</quote>. 
The designers were not happy with the query system. He clarified 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">btw: not saying thigns are hopeless -
just saying it sucks to be sitting on some pretty good stuff -
(base packages, sales, hr, etc) but having hands tied wrt implementation - 
it will all work out in due time - just i want to writing some apps 
:)</quote></p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Segmentation faults with GNUe Application Server"
   subject="[IRC] 10 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.10Dec2001"
   startdate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Application Server</topic>

<p>James Thompson (jamest) said he could create a segmentation fault with 
GNUe Application Server. He explained <quote who="James Thompson">i 
<cite>think</cite> what is happening is that if I create a empty 
query object and then tell it to execute query - geas server segfaults</quote>. 
Reinhard M&#252;ller (reinhard) said this was perfectly possible 
and said <quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">I will have a look at it</quote>.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Preferred database drivers for GNUe Forms and Designer"
   subject="[IRC] 10 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.10Dec2001"
   startdate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Forms</topic>
<topic>Designer</topic>

<p>Ulrich Ech (jack-e) asked what the best database driver was 
<quote who="Ulrich Ech">for use with forms/designer ??</quote>. 
James Thompson (jamest) said <quote who="James Thompson">pypgsql is the one I 
have used lately</quote>. Derek Neighbors (dneighbo) suggested 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">odbc is a little cleaner and no dependency 
:)</quote> He said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">as you can see we cant agree 
:) - but thats the great thing about gnue, its all about choices :)</quote>.
James said <quote who="James Thompson">I suggest that you not follow 
dneighbo's suggestions though as he always seems to trip up bugs</quote>. 
Derek riposted <quote who="Derek Neighbors">what jamest is really saying, 
is if you want to know if something 'really' works ask me :)</quote></p>

</section>


<section 
   title="SAP database driver for GNUe"
   subject="[IRC] 10 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.10Dec2001"
   startdate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Designer</topic>
<topic>Forms</topic>

<p>Ulrich Ech (jack-e) said <quote who="Ulrich Ech">i'm new to gnue and 
browsed through the cvs sources and saw that the sapdbdriver needs some 
help .. i'm willing to contribute but i will need help understanding the 
dbdrivers concept ..</quote> Jason Cater (jcater) said 
<quote who="Jason Cater">we really could use someone to write the schema 
introspection code for it</quote>. Later, Ulrich said 
<quote who="Ulrich Ech">I have done db-inspection of sapdb for use with 
pydo .. perhaps i could contribute this</quote>. Derek Neighbors (dneighbo) 
said GNUe Designer needed this <quote who="Derek Neighbors">for 
the 'wizards' to work - also anyone wishing to use common outside of 
gnue forms would find useful - and even within forms people might want 
the ability in triggers...</quote> James Thompson (jamest) said 
<quote who="James Thompson">I think postgresql drivers would be the one 
to learn from</quote> as that already had introspection. Derek said it was 
best to get the database connection code working first, 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">then when that is working move to the 
introspection functions (not they arent important, but they are less 
critical)</quote>.</p>

<p>Later, Ulrich confirmed <quote who="Ulrich Ech">basic zipcode-example 
works with sapdb .. now off to the introspection-thingies :)</quote>
He hadn't tested it with dates, however. James confirmed that the 
introspection did not include primary-foreign key relationships, although 
it could be extended to cover this. However, <quote who="James Thompson">the 
designer designs UI not the table layout at this time</quote>. He 
explained <quote who="James Thompson">schema discovery is a new feature of 
the dbdrivers and is not mature or complete - what we have now is setup 
your db - run a wizard in designer that looks at a single table and 
autobuilds a simple form - manipulate that form to get what you like - 
wizards can be written as plugins and I hope to see master/detail wizard 
someday - we can extend the dbdriver model to meet our needs if people 
find it lacking</quote>.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Data Types in GNUe Common"
   subject="[IRC] 10 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.10Dec2001"
   startdate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Common</topic>

<p>Ulrich Ech (jack-e) asked where he could get more information about what 
data types were supported in GNUe Common, reporting that he was 
<quote who="Ulrich Ech">half way of introspection-support for sapdb 
...</quote> Derek Neighbors (dneighbo) gave some examples of how the 
postgresql driver converted database-specific data types to more generic 
types for GNUe Common. He said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">i 
think the 'data types' in GNUe Forms are pretty 'limited'</quote>
Ulrich asked why <quote who="Ulrich Ech">in the oracle driver &quot;
LONG RAW&quot; is mapped to &quot;number&quot; this is strange ...</quote>
Jason Cater confimed that Oracle treated LONG RAW as 
<quote who="Jason Cater">Raw binary data up to 2 gigabytes (cannot be a 
key)</quote> Ulrich asked <quote who="Ulrich Ech">is there a hook for 
converting longs to e.g. stringio ?? sapdb needs to handle long-fields 
with some &lt;longfield&gt;.read() method ..</quote>. Jason said 
<quote who="Jason Cater">we haven't implemented blob-like support 
yet</quote> and suggested <quote who="Jason Cater">you might want to put a 
# TODO: comment in there saying that those types weren't implemented 
because you need buffer-like capabilities (or something to that 
effect)</quote>.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Using GNUe Designer"
   subject="[IRC] 11 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.11Dec2001"
   startdate="11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Designer</topic>
<topic>Why GNUe?</topic>

<p>Ulrich Ech said he <quote who="Ulrich Ech">still 
need to figure out how to build complex forms/apps</quote>
Derek Neighbors (dneighbo) said he usually started in GNUe 
Designer, and then would <quote who="Derek Neighbors">run 
a wizard against the 'biggest/base' table for my form
and let it auto create that. Then i use designer to add additional 
datasources (detail) and the widgets needd to support them</quote>.
Ulrich asked how to do master/detail forms. Derek said
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">just add a new datasource 
then in it fill out the information to bind to a master
[...] you have to pick the fields to 'link' on</quote>.</p>

<p>Derek said that using GNUe would always be more limited 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">in the sense you are a LOT less confined 
say writing an app in C and GTK+ - however it will take you a lot 
longer</quote> and <quote who="Derek Neighbors">you will be tied to 
single UI</quote>. It was a question of the right tool for the job. 
In his experience <quote who="Derek Neighbors"> thus far 'most' data 
aware business applications are a good choice for gnue
as fancy widgets etc arent all that necessary and the 
maintainability, speed to develop and UI choices are worth 
it</quote>.</p>

<p>Ulrich asked how to create a multi-form application. Derek said 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">currently what i have done is create a 
'launcher' form</quote> but he added <quote who="Derek Neighbors">we 
are working on a 'dynamic menuing' system</quote>. 
Daniel Baumann (chillywilly) said <quote who="Daniel Baumann">I don't 
see GNUe as being app ready...you can hack up a nice 2-tier app for 
now with it, but that's not what you want in the long run</quote>. 
Jason Cater (jcater) said <quote who="Jason Cater">there's 
nothing wrong with 2-tier - it's a different approach</quote>. 
James Thompson (jamest) added <quote who="James Thompson">i think 
you'd be amazed how many &quot;non app ready&quot; 2-tier solutions 
driver todays businesses</quote>.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Importing GNUe Forms code"
   subject="[IRC] 11 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.11Dec2001"
   startdate="11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Forms</topic>
<topic>Common</topic>

<p>Ulrich Ech (jack-e) said <quote who="Ulrich Ech">my first thought 
was to import the interesting parts of gnue-forms and use them 
directly .. has anyone done such a thing ??</quote> Derek Neighbors 
(dneighbo) said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">well that is what common 
was DESIGNED for :) so db abstraction, rpc abstraction, and everything 
else in common was designed to be available to any python developer 
wishing to use them. I think the parser is there too. If you were to 
start importing things into forms I would question why not add to 
forms what you need done instead of importing it</quote>.</p>

<p>James Thompson (jamest) said <quote who="James Thompson">the forms 
trigger language and the UI system on forms are currently both being 
rewritten so any input on where it's lacking would be greatly 
appreciated</quote>. Ulrich said <quote who="Ulrich Ech">ok 
.. let me first try all the things we are talking about 
before i rumble around with less knowledge about what i'm really 
talking :) i'm willing to bring in my ideas :) and probably some 
code as well .. but i really need to get into it .. as i've often 
said to others: read the sources, luke :))</quote> The thread 
degenerated into a good-natured feud over how difficult the GNUe 
Forms code was to read, and whose fault this (and everything else) 
was.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Electronic Business XML"
   subject="[IRC] 12 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.12Dec2001"
   startdate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Application Server</topic>

<p>Sacha Schlegel (SachaS) said <quote who="Sacha Schlegel">i am studying ebXML 
(electronic business XML. So today companies already use erp systems.
the ebXML specifications provide a framework to get a global electronic 
marketplace.</quote> This allows companies to <quote who="Sacha Schlegel">define 
their business processes in XML document and send this XML docuemnt 
to a registry.</quote> Businesses could use this registry to find trading 
partners with compatible business processes, and create a 
<quote who="Sacha Schlegel">new XML document, called Collaboration 
Protocol Agreement.</quote>. The ebXML software at both parties would then 
use this CPA to define <quote who="Sacha Schlegel">the 
roles (buyer, seller), the documents which have to be sent (order, 
shipment notice, bill etc) and in which order</quote>, using the data within 
each company's ERP system. This implies the need for a 
<quote who="Sacha Schlegel">gnue-ebxml convertor</quote>. 
He said <quote who="Sacha Schlegel">i think if there is a 
Business Process Engine within gnue (geas) where I can model business processes
</quote> this would be fairly easy to link in.</p>

<p>Reinhard M&#252;ller (reinhard) said <quote who="Reinhard M&#252;ller">my experience 
is that every company tries to have a single business process 
that is valid for all customers or all vendors</quote>. 
Sacha said <quote who="Sacha Schlegel">that 
the ebXML registry is filled with COMMON business processes</quote>. 
Although <quote who="Sacha Schlegel">ebXML 
targets Small to Medium Enterprises (SME) it looks like bigger 
companies will profit of ebXML first.</quote></p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Combo boxes in GNUe Designer"
   subject="[IRC] 12 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.12Dec2001"
   startdate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Designer</topic>

<p>It was asked how to define an integer field in Designer. 
Jason Cater (jcater) said <quote who="Jason Cater">there should be a 
&quot;typecast&quot; attribute that you can set to numeric</quote>.
He clarified <quote who="Jason Cater">the typecast property should have a 
combo box</quote>. Derek Neighbors said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">i 
think wx has screwed up painting so on the combo boxes it 'behaves' like 
a combobox, but it doesnt 'look' like one :) [...] i think its cause its a 
combo box in a grid</quote>. If the problem was definantely with wx, he 
would raise it as a log with <quote who="Derek Neighbors">the wx lists</quote>. 
Jason said <quote who="Jason Cater">there whole grid system is 
botched (and they know it :) I think we are the only major project using 
them (most others implement their own) but I had them displaying right at 
once</quote>.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Sandsurfer Time Recording"
   subject="[IRC] 12 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.12Dec2001"
   startdate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>Payroll</topic>
<topic>DCL</topic>
<topic>Forms</topic>

<p>Jason Pattie (pattieja) had helped to build 
<a href="http://sandsurfer.sourceforge.net">Sandsurfer</a>,
<quote who="Jason Pattie">an open source time keeping tool we wrote</quote> 
in perl. They were looking to link this to an open source payroll system. 
Derek Neighbors (dneighbo) said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">we dont have 
payroll done BUT i have customers needing it so i would be willing to make 
it priority</quote>. He said he normally didn't care for web-based 
applications, <quote who="Derek Neighbors">but i see value in web based 
'time entry' i.e. clock in clock out</quote>. Jason Pattie explained 
<quote who="Jason Pattie">SandSurfer has client billing included and some 
other company related features</quote>. Derek said it could either be 
incorporated into GNUe, or integrated by <quote who="Derek Neighbors">being 
flexible to someone adding stubs where necessary to interface to GNUe</quote>. 
GNUe normally used python rather than perl, but Jason Pattie said 
<quote who="Jason Pattie">we wanted to rewrite the whole thing anyway</quote>. 
He confirmed that Sandsurfer did not currently do notifications 
for incorrect/incomplete time.</p>

<p>Derek said that <a href="http://dcl.sf.net">DCL</a> was a 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">good performance metrics tool, but not a hard 
core when are you at work when aren't you tool</quote>. Jason Cater said 
his organisation used swipe cards with a <quote who="Jason Cater">magnetic 
strip</quote> and proprietary software. Derek had previously set 
up a web-based system - <quote who="Derek Neighbors">any terminal with a 
webbroswer could clock you in</quote>. For non-PC users, they 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">put a pc at front desk (running linux) that 
was OLD like 486 and have it with browser open to page - it was 'login' 
click the button logout</quote>. This was then extended to 
a remote location as well.</p>

<p>Derek said that <quote who="Derek Neighbors">if you are serious about 
using gnue we can probably focus some attention to a solution - if you 
needed something yesterday and only want something that is ready now today 
out of box, then gnue wont work :)</quote> Jason Pattie said 
<quote who="Jason Pattie">this will be a process of growth - my boss wanted 
to incorporate payroll into SandSurfer, but wanted to check to make sure 
that there weren't systems out there already so we wouldn't reinvent the 
wheel yet another time.</quote> They were currently using 
<quote who="Jason Pattie">a web-based accounting system which is open 
source as well called <a href="http://xiwa.sourceforge.net">XIWA</a>
(XIWA Is Web Accounting)</quote>. Derek asked <quote who="Derek Neighbors">
any reason you didnt use <a href="http://www.sql-ledger.com/">
sql-ledger/</a> [...] just curious as it seems popular and is perl 
(iirc)</quote>. A lot of people interested in using GNUe long-term were 
currently using it as an alternative to gnucash. He personally 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">still cant imagine doing books via a web 
interface, but i suppose if you are low volume you could do so w/o tearing 
your hair out</quote>. Because of validation issues, the entry forms often 
had to have multiple pages. <quote who="Derek Neighbors">Redrawing the 
screen after every 'action'</quote> was also not suitable for high-volume 
usage. The GNUe HTML front-end would have similar issues, 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">the difference is it become optional w/o 
recode so if i make a gnue form for something it can be used web, curses, 
gtk, win32 - so the folks doing 500 invoices can use gtk or such and not 
suffer penalty - but for a same disparate organization they can use the 
webforms</quote>.</p>

<p>Derek said he could knock up some demo forms in GNUe 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">like the edit/add/deletion of users</quote>
and would see if he had time to <quote who="Derek Neighbors">install 
sandsurfer</quote>. The management screens could be written in GNUe Forms, 
leaving the web-based front-end for clocking in or out. Also, 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">i might be able to take our hr spec and whip 
up employee screens which would be the basis of your user tables
</quote> so that an employee's <quote who="Derek Neighbors">login 
references their hr record for like thier name, job title etc</quote>.</p>

</section>


<section 
   title="Using DCL for the GNUe Project internally"
   subject="[IRC] 12 Dec 2001"
   archive="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/irc-logs/gnue-public.log.12Dec2001"
   startdate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800"
   enddate="12 Dec 2001 00:00:00 -0800">

<topic>DCL</topic>

<p>Derek Neighbors (derek) confirmed that the GNUe Project is now using
<a href="http://dcl.sf.net">DCL</a> internally. 
He <quote who="Derek Neighbors">needs to create a 'guest' account so people 
can see whats there then create a little page so can create an account to 
'add' items</quote> Nick Rusnov (nickr) suggested <quote who="Nick Rusnov">a 
non-login account for tickets</quote>. Michael Dean (mdean) suggested an
<quote who="Michael Dean">e-mail gateway</quote>. Derek said 
people would be able to either register to create tickets, or 
<quote who="Derek Neighbors">just email bugs@gnue.org and 
it autocreates a ticket :) via gateway - the 'advantage' to registering 
will be then you can get the 'status' of your ticket and status will be 
mailed to you etc etc etc</quote> He said <quote who="Derek Neighbors">for 
now you can see whats there by using user: guest pass: guest
<a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/dclgw/">
http://www.gnuenterprise.org/dclgw/</a></quote>. GNUe team members 
would be given their own individual usernames and passwords soon. He 
confessed <quote who="Derek Neighbors">best way to get one is email me 
lots of crap that should be in dcl and i will get sick of entering it 
and give you an id instead and tell you to enter it :)</quote>.</p>

</section>

</kc>
